Ultrasound Tech Pay

Roseville vs San Francisco: Ultrasound Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare ultrasound technologist salaries between Roseville, CA and San Francisco, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Roseville, CA
$170,562
$82.00/hr
San Francisco, CA
$168,171
$80.85/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRoseville, CASan Francisco, CA
Median Salary$170,562$168,171
Hourly Rate$82.00$80.85
Entry Level (P10)$123,435$99,264
25th Percentile$144,055$129,463
75th Percentile$186,920$190,123
Top Earner (P90)$235,757$214,204
Total Employed351,300
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Roseville ($170,562) and San Francisco ($168,171) ultrasound technologist salaries.RosevilleSan FranciscoMedian Salary$170,562$168,171Entry Level (P10)$123,435$99,264Top Earner (P90)$235,757$214,204US Median $101,352

Verdict

Roseville, CA offers better overall compensation for ultrasound technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to San Francisco.

The salary gap between Roseville and San Francisco is $2,391 (1.42%). Roseville's median is +68.29% compared to the US national median of $101,352.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Roseville spans $112,322,San Francisco spans $114,940. San Francisco has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced ultrasound technologists.

Roseville
P10 (Entry)$123,435
P25$144,055
Median$170,562
P75$186,920
P90 (Top)$235,757
San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$99,264
P25$129,463
Median$168,171
P75$190,123
P90 (Top)$214,204

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Roseville ($150,806 effective) pays 3.68% more than San Francisco ($145,460 effective).

Roseville
Nominal: $170,562
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $150,806
San Francisco
Nominal: $168,171
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $145,460

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Roseville if…

  • Higher median salary ($170,562/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($235,757)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $150,806)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Larger job market (1,300 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, ultrasound technologist salaries in Roseville grew 15.2% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 39.6% growth in San Francisco over the same period.

Roseville, CA

+15.2%

$141,063 (2024) → $162,548 (2025)

San Francisco, CA

+39.6%

$114,790 (2019) → $160,270 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays ultrasound technologists more: Roseville or San Francisco?

Roseville has a higher median ultrasound technologist salary at $170,562/year, compared to San Francisco at $168,171/year — a difference of $2,391 (1.42%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Roseville and San Francisco?

Roseville ultrasound technologists earn $82.00/hr while San Francisco hygienists earn $80.85/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Roseville to San Francisco as a ultrasound technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Roseville and San Francisco. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Roseville = $150,806, San Francisco = $145,460), job availability (35 vs 1,300 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level ultrasound technologists earn in Roseville vs San Francisco?

Entry-level (10th percentile) ultrasound technologists earn $123,435 in Roseville and $99,264 in San Francisco. The Roseville area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

RP

Written by Ravi Patel, RDMS, RVT

Career Analyst

Ravi has 10 years of experience as an ultrasound technologist. He specializes in abdominal and pelvic imaging. He works in a community hospital.

Clinically reviewed by Maria Gonzalez, RDMS, RTData verified by James Kim, RDCS, RVT

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 4.93% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Ravi Patel, RDMS, RVT, a licensed ultrasound technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov